Market Signal Audit
The audit answers a commercial question, not a quality one.
What is your current approach costing you, by market, by title, by release?
Request the auditSix phases
The audit runs on public data and published signals. No analytics access is required for the initial findings.
- 01 · footprint
- Revenue by market plotted against content investment by market. A market generating 18% of EU revenue but receiving 6% of investment carries a 12-point gap: quantifiable, defensible, board-ready.
- 02 · depth
- What localised content exists, at what depth, at what recency, with what parity to English. Velocity gap measured in days behind EN-US.
- 03 · community
- Steam reviews by language, forum and Discord threads, run through NLP for sentiment index, incident frequency, and error virality per market.
- 04 · competitive
- Three to five same-genre competitors audited at identical depth. Knowing a competitor ships DE content 48 hours ahead of you changes the framing entirely.
- 05 · revenue
- Review scores against localisation quality by region. Adoption rate by locale. The link between content quality and live service revenue, quantified.
- 06 · programme
- A phased design mapped to the findings. Markets sequenced by gap-to-revenue ratio. Twelve-month leverage curve. The programme appears as the answer to what the audit found, not a pitch appended to it.
What we need from you
Thirty minutes. Your active markets, your release slate for the next twelve months, and which content types are currently in scope. That's the full briefing requirement.
What is your multilingual content actually costing you per release?
The audit tells you before either side commits to anything.
Book the briefing call