Your content problem probably isn't a language problem.
They're not language failures, and Inteprit was founded on exactly that observation: build something that fixes the structural problem underneath rather than endlessly treating the symptom on the surface.
What you can hold us to.
A promise is only worth something if you can check it, so ours is written to be measured rather than admired. Four things are true from the first project and stay true for as long as we run your programme.
One team owns it, end to end
When something goes wrong in a market there is one person to call, and they already know about it.
The intent survives the handoff
What your team meant is what your customer reads, because the brief travels with the content instead of evaporating at the first transfer.
It gets cheaper as it goes
Everything we translate becomes an asset that belongs to you, so your cost per market falls with each cycle rather than resetting with every job.
You see the same numbers we do
Leverage, quality and market performance, reported on a fixed rhythm, including the quarters where the numbers are not flattering.
Why Inteprit exists.
Inteprit started with a gap that kept refusing to close.
Across more than a decade inside the multilingual content operations of global brands and agencies, the same failure kept appearing in different costumes. A gaming publisher whose Korean community found the errors before internal QA did. A bank whose disclosure carried one term rendered three ways across three documents. A retailer whose German campaign underperformed and was quietly written off as market conditions. Different sectors, different content, different budgets, and underneath every one of them the same quiet break: something left the brief that never arrived in the market, and nobody owned the gap between what was approved and what actually shipped.
The industry's answer was always more of the same. More vendors, more review stages, more quality checks bolted onto the end. None of it worked, because none of it touched the actual break, which happened long before anyone started translating.
So Inteprit was built to sit in that gap. Not as another supplier in the chain, but as the operation that owns the chain, from the brief arriving to the content going live, in every market and every language a brand publishes in.
Translation is easy. We solve what reaches the market.
Here is the whole business in one example. A radio script written in Afrikaans for a Cape Town audience is technically flawless Afrikaans. Run it for a Johannesburg audience and listeners clock it as caricature inside three seconds: the same language and the same words on the page, but wrong for the market, and no dictionary, no engine, and no vendor working from a distance will ever catch it.
That isn't translation. It's knowing which community you're speaking to and what it costs when you get it wrong, and where most suppliers sell you the first thing, we were built for the second.
Which is why we will also tell you, plainly, when translation is all you need and the rest would be us overselling. A company that only ever says yes is a company you cannot trust with the times the answer is no.
What we actually optimise for.
Values are easy to write and hard to prove, so ours are the ones you would notice if we stopped holding them.
Say the difficult thing early
If a market is not worth entering, a deadline is not achievable, or the approach you have asked for carries a risk you have not seen, you will hear it in the first conversation rather than the post-mortem. Being agreeable is not the same as being useful.
Measure it or drop it
We report numbers rather than adjectives, and if a claim cannot be evidenced from the platform it does not go in the report.
The assets are yours
Your memories, termbases and glossaries belong to your brand. A partner who locks up your linguistic assets is protecting their position rather than your interests.
Craft still counts
Knowing when a line should be recreated and when it must be rendered exactly is the difference between competence and expertise, and it is the part automation does not replace.
Own the outcome, not the task
Delivering on time against a brief that was wrong is not success. We are accountable for whether it worked in market.
We are in the communication business, so we hold ourselves to it.
It would be strange to sell clarity across languages and then write like a vendor.
Plain language, always
No jargon where an ordinary word exists, and no acronym without its meaning attached. If you need a glossary to read our reports, we have failed at the thing you hired us for.
Bad news travels fastest
A slipping deadline, a quality problem, a market that is not performing: you hear it from us early and with a proposed fix, not at the review when it is too late to act.
One thread, one owner
You are not managing a relationship across four inboxes. There is a named person who knows your programme, and they answer.
Numbers over narrative
Status updates carry the leverage rate, the score distribution and the delivery position. Confidence is not a metric.
Written to be forwarded
Everything we send is built so you can pass it to a colleague or a board without having to translate it first.
A company built out of the markets it serves.
Inteprit is not a head office with a supply chain attached, and the people deciding how your brand sounds in a market generally live in it. That shapes how the company works.
In-market by default
Our language leads are based in the markets they are accountable for, so the register they choose comes from hearing the language used rather than from a style guide alone.
Specialists alongside linguists
Regulated, technical and educational content is reviewed by people who understand the subject as well as the language, because a sentence can be linguistically perfect and still wrong.
Operators, not order-takers
We hire people who ask why a piece of content exists before asking what it says, and who are comfortable telling a client the brief needs fixing.
Distributed on purpose
Working across 30+ markets means writing things down and running asynchronously, which is also why nothing important depends on one person being awake.
Where we are going.
A world where a brand's content lands as well in its fortieth market as it does in its first, and where nobody involved finds that remarkable.
Getting there means treating multilingual content as an operating capability rather than a procurement line, with the discipline a business already applies to its supply chain or its finances. It means the brief being a real document rather than an email. It means terminology being an owned asset rather than an accident. And it means that when a market underperforms, the first question is what the data says rather than whether it was the market.
Over the coming years the cost of producing language will keep collapsing while the cost of getting it wrong keeps climbing, because more content reaches more markets faster than any review process was built for. The brands that come through that well will be the ones that built the operation early. We would like to be the reason they did.
Devon Bezuidenhout
Founder & Managing Director
With over a decade embedded in the multilingual content operations of global brands and agencies, across games, entertainment, consumer technology, finance, and retail; the pattern I kept meeting, brief failure, vendor fragmentation, no single point of accountability, is what Inteprit was built to resolve.
We operate across 30+ markets, with Language Leads in each who understand that high-stakes marketing is not translated but recreated, and that a regulated disclosure is not recreated but rendered exactly. Knowing which mode each piece of content needs is the job.
translate@inteprit.com →See what an accountable programme would change.
Start with the audit. Thirty minutes, built on public data.
Get a quote →